WPBulky vs Bulk WP (2025): Which WordPress Cleanup Tool Should You Use?

Lucija

5 hours ago

A fast WordPress site is usually a clean WordPress site. After a couple of redesigns, plugin swaps, and seasonal campaigns, databases bloat with drafts, orphaned terms, stale meta, duplicate titles, and test media. You can click through wp-admin for hours—or you can run targeted bulk deletions in minutes with a tool built for the job.

This review compares the free starter, WPBulky, with the full-featured pro suite, Bulk WP, and gives you practical recipes to ship a safer, leaner cleanup—without touching SQL.

TL;DR (who should pick what)

Pick WPBulky if you want a free, low-risk way to learn the workflow and clear the obvious junk (old drafts/pages, basic taxonomy and status filters).
Pick Bulk WP if you need scheduling, batching, and advanced filters (custom fields/meta, duplicate titles, user cleanup, attachments, comment meta) or you manage multiple sites and want repeatable hygiene.

If you run an active WooCommerce, news/magazine, or membership site, you’ll outgrow free pretty fast—the scheduler and extra filters pay for themselves in one decent cleanup.

What both tools do well

Filter by content properties you actually use: post type, status, categories/tags, taxonomies, date created, and visibility.
Delete in bulk with guardrails, so editors don’t need SQL to act safely.
Reveal scope before you pull the trigger, cutting “oh no” moments.
Work from wp-admin, meaning no shell access or custom scripts required.

Where Bulk WP pulls ahead

Scheduling (WP-Cron): turn hygiene into a habit. Weekly draft/revision purges and monthly orphaned-term sweeps keep the DB lean automatically.
Batch processing: process big sets in controlled chunks to avoid timeouts on shared hosting.
Advanced targets via add-ons:
- Delete by custom fields (great for retired CPTs and plugin leftovers)
- Delete by content (catch spam floods and templated junk)
- Delete by duplicate title (reduce search noise)
- Delete attachments by patterns or windows (post-hack triage)
- Delete users by role or user meta (dormant accounts, test users)
- Delete comment meta (nuke injected junk cleanly)

Practical cleanups you can copy today

1) Drafts older than 90 days

Clear the “someday” pile without touching recent work.

Filter: Status = Draft, Created < now − 90 days
Run a small batch first (25–50 items), then scale.

2) Campaign leftovers

After seasonal pushes, remove test posts and landing pages.

Filter: Category = Campaign-Test OR Tag IN {test, temp}
Optional: Created within last 120–180 days

3) Orphaned terms

Taxonomy sludge hurts search and admin UX.

Filter: Term post count = 0
Sweep categories, tags, and custom taxonomies.

4) Duplicate titles (Bulk WP)

Fix archive search quality fast.

Filter: Post type = post, Duplicate title = true
Keep newest; remove older dupes after a quick eyeball.

5) Dormant subscribers (Bulk WP)

Tidy user tables with policy-safe logic.

Filter: Role = Subscriber, last_login meta is null, Registered < now − 180 days
Align with your privacy/data policy.

6) Incident-window uploads (Bulk WP)

Post-hack or bad import cleanup.

Filter: Attachments created between T1 and T2, file pattern includes .zip/unknown mimetypes
Batch in small sets; verify after each pass.

7) Revisions sweep (Bulk WP)

Keep tables slim—especially before migrations.

Action: Delete all revisions
Schedule: Weekly in off-hours

Safety SOP (don’t skip this)

Backup first (DB at minimum). If you can’t restore, you can’t risk it.
Start tiny: run the rule on 10–50 items; confirm front-end and admin views.
Layer filters (status + age + taxonomy) rather than one broad rule.
Avoid overlapping schedules that target the same slice.
Log what you did: rule, count, date window. Future-you will thank you.

Why cleanup before migrations and big updates

A smaller DB means:

Faster export/import and lower downtime
Fewer timeouts and lockups during version upgrades
Cleaner search/indexing after cutover
Snappier backups and restores
Saner QA (less noise to sift through)

Purge first, migrate second. It’s the cheapest risk reduction you can buy.

Editor and SEO side-effects (the good kind)

Fewer duplicates = cleaner search and category archives
Tighter sitemaps and better crawl efficiency
Smaller media library → faster media screens and backups
Easier internal linking when archives aren’t padded with junk

Pros and cons

WPBulky (free)

Pros: zero cost, friendly learning curve, solid for basic purges
Cons: no scheduler, fewer targeting options, limited for post-hack or enterprise hygiene

Bulk WP (pro)

Pros: advanced filters + scheduling + batching; purpose-built add-ons; perfect for agencies and large sites
Cons: paid license; power requires discipline (use small test batches); still deletion-only—pair with your bulk editor for mass updates that aren’t removals

Who should use which

Choose WPBulky if:

You’re cleaning a small blog or brochure site
You need a one-time tidy-up and want to test the waters
Your rules are simple (status/age/taxonomy)

Choose Bulk WP if:

You manage WooCommerce, newsrooms, LMS, or an agency fleet
You want scheduled hygiene and batch-safe big runs
You need to target by custom fields, content patterns, users/meta, or attachments
You’re prepping for migrations or recovering from incidents

Setup to first win in 10 minutes

Install WPBulky and clear one safe target (e.g., orphaned terms or drafts > 90 days).
Validate the results on the front-end and admin.
If you need schedules, custom fields, users, or attachments: install Bulk WP.
Create two scheduled jobs:
- Weekly: delete revisions; clear trash
- Monthly: orphaned terms; drafts > 90 days
Record rules and results in your ops notes.

Verdict

Both tools make cleanup safe and fast in wp-admin. If your needs are simple or you’re testing the waters, start with WPBulky. If you run serious sites—or just want to stop thinking about cleanup and let schedules handle it—Bulk WP is the better long-term fit. Do one small run today, schedule two hygiene jobs, and enjoy a faster, quieter dashboard all year.

Author
Recent Posts

Lucija

I used to write about games but now work on web development topics at WebFactory Ltd. I've studied e-commerce and internet advertising, and I'm skilled in WordPress and social media. I like design, marketing, and economics. Even though I've changed my job focus, I still play games for fun.